Zeitschriften

  • SIST Journal of Pharmacy

    Types of Articles

    Research Articles

    Research articles are essential for disseminating the findings of original research studies. These manuscripts must detail the research methodology rigorously and provide a robust analysis of the results, contributing valuable insights to the field. Notably, systematic reviews can also be submitted as research articles, enriching the academic discourse on these critical topics.

    Review Articles

    A review article serves as a comprehensive overview of the existing literature in a specific subject area, synthesizing key findings and identifying trends that guide future research. This type of article is vital for researchers seeking to understand the landscape of a topic.

    Short Communications

    Short communications offer a dynamic platform for authors eager to share their results with the research community in a concise and impactful manner. This format ensures that important findings are rapidly communicated, fostering collaboration and innovation within the field.

    Letter to editor

    A Letter to the Editor serves as a powerful tool for readers to express their opinions, highlight important issues, and engage with current topics of public interest. Typically published in the "Letters to the Editor" section, these letters provide a platform for individuals to influence public discourse and raise awareness about vital matters in our communities.

    Mini-Reviews

    Mini-reviews provide a concise summary of a specific research topic or field relevant to Molecular Medicine. They put previous research and findings in context and present current developments in a critical and focused manner. Key aims of mini-reviews are to provide coverage of mature or emerging subjects, evaluations of progress in specified areas, and/or critical assessments of new technologies. Mini-reviews should be balanced and an excessive focus on the authors’ own work should be avoided. Mini-reviews should be no longer than 3,500 words, contain no more than two figures or tables, and about 60 references. The mini-review abstract should not exceed 200 words

    Preparation of manuscripts

    1. Title Page

    Provide a concise, informative, and attractive title.

    Include the full names (first, middle initial, last), highest qualifications, institutional affiliations,

    official phone numbers, and email addresses of all authors.

    Indicate author positions using superscripts.

    Mark the corresponding author with an asterisk (*).

    1. Language & Formatting

    Manuscripts must be written in clear, grammatically correct English.

    Submit in MS Word or PDF format.

    Use Times New Roman or Arial, size 12, with double spacing.

    Type on A4-sized paper.

    1. Manuscript Length

    Research articles: Max. 4000 words.

    Mini review articles: Max. 3500 words.

    References: Up to 35 (45 for novel research).

    Include the following sections: Abstract, Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, References, and Acknowledgements.

    Color images appear online; black & white in print.

    1. Abstract

    Submit as a separate file.

    Structured abstract: Max. 250 words.

    Include: Background, Objective, Methods, Main Outcome, Results, Conclusion.

    Add up to 5 keywords/indexing terms.

    Avoid abbreviations, tables, and figures in the abstract.

    1. Introduction

    Clearly state the research aim.

    Define the problem and rationale.

    Be focused and concise.

    1. Materials and Methods

    Clearly describe the procedures and materials used.

    Ethical approval letter must be attached if involving humans or animals.

    1. Results

    Present comprehensive findings supported by data.

    Avoid redundancy.

    Tables and figures must be on separate pages/files.

    Acceptable image formats: JPG, PNG, TIFF.

    Cite tables and figures appropriately (e.g., (Table 1)).

    1. Discussion

    Interpret findings in context of existing literature.

    Highlight key contributions and limitations.

    Discuss implications and future directions.

    Apply proper statistical analysis.

    1. Conclusion

    Present a logical and concise summary of key findings.

    1. Funding Disclosure

    Clearly state funding sources, sponsorships, or support from any institutions.

    Mention provided materials or equipment.

    1. Acknowledgements

    Optional but should appear before the references if included.

    1. Competing Interests

    Declare any potential conflicts (financial, professional, or personal).

    Submit the conflict of interest form (available on the journal website).

    1. Author Contributions

    State specific contributions of each author in research and manuscript preparation.

    1. References

    Use citation-sequence (numbered) format.

    Refer to "Citing Medicine" by the National Library of Medicine.

    Abbreviate journal names per PubMed guidelines.

    Avoid citing unpublished work or personal communication.

    Example Formats:

    JournalArticle:
    Khalil B. Observation on the food and feeding habits of Cynoglossus bilineatus. Rads J Biol Res Appl Sci. 2012;3(1):1-6.

    Book:
    Talaro KP, Talaro A. Foundations in microbiology: basic principles. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 2002.

    BookChapter:
    Forman MS, Valsamakis A. Specimen collection. In: Versalovic J, et al., editors. Manual of clinical microbiology. 10th ed. Washington: ASM Press; 2011. p.1276-88.

    Website:
    Lewis A. How Microbes May Influence Our Behavior. The Scientist; 2017 Sep 1 [cited 2017 Sep 19]. Available from: http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/50146

    1. Cover Letter

    Submit a cover letter signed by the corresponding author.

     

    1. Suggested Reviewers

    Provide names and contact details of three experts.

    Reviewers must not have conflicts of interest (e.g., same institution, collaborators).

    1. Peer Review Process

    Double-blind system.

    Editors screen for relevance and formatting.

    Reviewers are given 2–3 weeks for evaluation.

    Expected review timeline: up to 40 days.

    1. Ethical Compliance

    For human/animal studies, attach IRB approval.

    Follow ethical guidelines outlined by COPE: COPE Standards for Authors

    1. Plagiarism Policy

    Checked via Turnitin.

    Manuscripts with similarity >19% will be rejected.

    1. Manuscript Withdrawal

    Withdrawal is not permitted after peer review has begun, except in ethical cases approved by the Editor-in-Chief.

    1. Required Forms

    Author Contribution Form

    Declaration of Interest Form

    Copyright Transfer Agreement

    Copyright form

     

  • SIST Journal of Medical Science

    Aims & Scope

    The journal is dedicated to serving as a premier platform for the global scientific community, offering an exceptional opportunity to publish and disseminate high-quality research in the dynamic field of pharmaceutical sciences. Join us in advancing knowledge and innovation in this vital area of study.

    Public and global health policy, Clinical and biomedical research, Specialized medicine, Medical education ethics, Nutrition and mental health, Epidemiology health services.

    Submission

    Manuscripts must be submitted exclusively by one of the authors through our online Submission System. We only accept electronic files in Word format (.doc, .docx, .rtf) to ensure a smooth review process. Please note that submissions made by anyone other than an author will not be considered. The submitting author assumes full responsibility for the manuscript throughout the submission and peer review stages. If you encounter any technical difficulties with online submission, please reach out to us for alternative submission options. Your compliance with these guidelines is crucial for an efficient and effective review process.

    Terms and Conditions

    Manuscripts must be submitted  to this journal and not submitted or published elsewhere. The submitting author must secure approval from all co-authors for publication. Authors also permit editing for clarity. Direct any publication inquiries to Email

    Types of Articles

    Research Articles

    Research articles are essential for disseminating the findings of original research studies. These manuscripts must detail the research methodology rigorously and provide a robust analysis of the results, contributing valuable insights to the field. Notably, systematic reviews can also be submitted as research articles, enriching the academic discourse on these critical topics.

    Review Articles

    A review article serves as a comprehensive overview of the existing literature in a specific subject area, synthesizing key findings and identifying trends that guide future research. This type of article is vital for researchers seeking to understand the landscape of a topic.

    Short Communications

    Short communications offer a dynamic platform for authors eager to share their results with the research community in a concise and impactful manner. This format ensures that important findings are rapidly communicated, fostering collaboration and innovation within the field.

    Letter to editor

    A Letter to the Editor serves as a powerful tool for readers to express their opinions, highlight important issues, and engage with current topics of public interest. Typically published in the "Letters to the Editor" section, these letters provide a platform for individuals to influence public discourse and raise awareness about vital matters in our communities.

    Mini-Reviews

    Mini-reviews provide a concise summary of a specific research topic or field relevant to Molecular Medicine. They put previous research and findings in context and present current developments in a critical and focused manner. Key aims of mini-reviews are to provide coverage of mature or emerging subjects, evaluations of progress in specified areas, and/or critical assessments of new technologies. Mini-reviews should be balanced and an excessive focus on the authors’ own work should be avoided. Mini-reviews should be no longer than 3,500 words, contain no more than two figures or tables, and about 60 references. The mini-review abstract should not exceed 200 words

    Preparation of manuscripts

    1. Title Page

    Provide a concise, informative, and attractive title.

    Include the full names (first, middle initial, last), highest qualifications, institutional affiliations,

    official phone numbers, and email addresses of all authors.

    Indicate author positions using superscripts.

    Mark the corresponding author with an asterisk (*).

    1. Language & Formatting

    Manuscripts must be written in clear, grammatically correct English.

    Submit in MS Word or PDF format.

    Use Times New Roman or Arial, size 12, with double spacing.

    Type on A4-sized paper.

    1. Manuscript Length

    Research articles: Max. 4000 words.

    Mini review articles: Max. 3500 words.

    References: Up to 35 (45 for novel research).

    Include the following sections: Abstract, Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, References, and Acknowledgements.

    Color images appear online; black & white in print.

    1. Abstract

    Submit as a separate file.

    Structured abstract: Max. 250 words.

    Include: Background, Objective, Methods, Main Outcome, Results, Conclusion.

    Add up to 5 keywords/indexing terms.

    Avoid abbreviations, tables, and figures in the abstract.

    1. Introduction

    Clearly state the research aim.

    Define the problem and rationale.

    Be focused and concise.

    1. Materials and Methods

    Clearly describe the procedures and materials used.

    Ethical approval letter must be attached if involving humans or animals.

    1. Results

    Present comprehensive findings supported by data.

    Avoid redundancy.

    Tables and figures must be on separate pages/files.

    Acceptable image formats: JPG, PNG, TIFF.

    Cite tables and figures appropriately (e.g., (Table 1)).

    1. Discussion

    Interpret findings in context of existing literature.

    Highlight key contributions and limitations.

    Discuss implications and future directions.

    Apply proper statistical analysis.

    1. Conclusion

    Present a logical and concise summary of key findings.

    1. Funding Disclosure

    Clearly state funding sources, sponsorships, or support from any institutions.

    Mention provided materials or equipment.

    1. Acknowledgements

    Optional but should appear before the references if included.

    1. Competing Interests

    Declare any potential conflicts (financial, professional, or personal).

    Submit the conflict of interest form (available on the journal website).

    1. Author Contributions

    State specific contributions of each author in research and manuscript preparation.

    1. References

    Use citation-sequence (numbered) format.

    Refer to "Citing Medicine" by the National Library of Medicine.

    Abbreviate journal names per PubMed guidelines.

    Avoid citing unpublished work or personal communication.

    Example Formats:

    JournalArticle:
    Khalil B. Observation on the food and feeding habits of Cynoglossus bilineatus. Rads J Biol Res Appl Sci. 2012;3(1):1-6.

    Book:
    Talaro KP, Talaro A. Foundations in microbiology: basic principles. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 2002.

    BookChapter:
    Forman MS, Valsamakis A. Specimen collection. In: Versalovic J, et al., editors. Manual of clinical microbiology. 10th ed. Washington: ASM Press; 2011. p.1276-88.

    Website:
    Lewis A. How Microbes May Influence Our Behavior. The Scientist; 2017 Sep 1 [cited 2017 Sep 19]. Available from: http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/50146

    1. Cover Letter

    Submit a cover letter signed by the corresponding author.

     

    1. Suggested Reviewers

    Provide names and contact details of three experts.

    Reviewers must not have conflicts of interest (e.g., same institution, collaborators).

    1. Peer Review Process

    Double-blind system.

    Editors screen for relevance and formatting.

    Reviewers are given 2–3 weeks for evaluation.

    Expected review timeline: up to 40 days.

    1. Ethical Compliance

    For human/animal studies, attach IRB approval.

    Follow ethical guidelines outlined by COPE: COPE Standards for Authors

    1. Plagiarism Policy

    Checked via Turnitin.

    Manuscripts with similarity >19% will be rejected.

    1. Manuscript Withdrawal

    Withdrawal is not permitted after peer review has begun, except in ethical cases approved by the Editor-in-Chief.

    1. Required Forms

    Author Contribution Form

    Declaration of Interest Form

    Copyright Transfer Agreement

    Copyright form